Now on DVD

Unnecessary trip down memory lane in Parkland

lars logo“The man has been hit,” a Secret Service agent says into his mouthpiece. “Repeat, the man has been hit.”

How to tell the tragic story of the Kennedy assassination in a fresh way with a new angle. It’s with that skeptical eye that one enters Parkland, an eerily authentic recreation of the immediate aftermath of the event that altered the trajectory of the United States of America.

Two fresh takes come early in director Peter Landesman’s film.

parklandFirst, while the Presidential motorcade makes it way through Dealey Plaza, we see Abraham Zapruder (Paul Giamatti) scurry to gain a high perch to film the approach. The camera stays on Zapruder as we hear the gun shots ring out, his reaction gradual once he realizes what he is actually filming. Once we see his now infamous footage, we only partially glimpse the assassination in the reflection of his glasses in a screening room with the Secret Service. Very effective. WARNING: I have linked up the Zapruder footage, it is graphic and hard to watch.

Second, once the news comes across the wire that Lee H. Oswald has been taken in to custody as the prime suspect, we see the reaction of Oswald’s brother (James Badge Dale) as his office colleagues surround him “Bob, is that your brother?”

Oswald didn’t just alter history, he ruined a lot of lives. But, this should be no news flash.

The writers did their research and the look of the picture is spot on.

This is not a conspiracy film. Thank God.

The casting is across the board strong. Standing out are David Harbour as the irate Dallas Police official with egg on his face, Marcia Gay Harden as Parkland Hospital’s shell-shocked head nurse on the scene, and Billy Bob Thornton doing his best G.D. Spradlin impersonation as the head of the Dallas Secret Service Bureau, Forrest Sorrels.

So, the nine million dollar questions:

Did Parkland need to be made?

Subjective.

Does it shed any new light on this event?

Not really.

Is there a public craving for more examination of this tragedy?

If box office draw is a reasonable (fair?) way to gauge, the answer is a resounding no. Budgeted at $10m, it has grossed well under $1m to date and will surely not fare well overseas. No Jackie Chan, no Sly Stallone, and teen throb Zac Efron keeps his shirt on the entire film while playing a distraught resident surgeon unable to revive the dead President.

With the 50th anniversary of the John F. Kennedy assassination now in our rear view mirror, we Americans seem to be somberly secure in our collective appreciation for what might have been.

I think Landesman was attempting to say something profound in his triangular juxtaposition of Oswald’s lonely and ostracized funeral  (“There are no pallbearers.”) with the news footage of a nation in mourning of Camelot fallen, and officer James Hosty’s (Ron Livingston) burying of incriminating evidence that Oswald had threatened him three weeks prior – set to Walter Cronkite’s familiar voice saying that “The larger question is…that few Americans will go to bed tonight without carrying the feeling that somehow they have failed” and that “John Fitzgerald Kennedy did not die in vain.”

I’m just not sure what it was.

Parkland ultimately ends up nothing more than yet another depressing reminder of how quickly things can change (see 9/11) and bright lights can be turned dim (see Newtown).

2 thoughts on “Unnecessary trip down memory lane in Parkland

  1. Thank you Lars. A thoughtful analysis of an interesting film that treads on the sacred ground of the National and Global psyche. I agree with everything you have expressed and believe you have revealed the value of this project in your final observations. Landesman did say something profound by injecting new layers of humanity into these otherwise iconic characters. While this film may not be the hit gift during the holidays, I believe it could be a nice addition to the DVD collection of any who still wrestle with one of the most significant events in our Nation’s history. It might also provide a great lead-off to in class discussions for today’s youth who have no memory of where they were 50 years ago…

  2. Interesting idea, Paul, and you are right, unfortunately, about our history slipping from the consciousness. In that respect, this film is an interesting time capsule…I guess. My problem was in the relevance of the theme, and not totally convinced the filmmaker knew what he was trying to say. If it was summed up in Cronkite’s news monologue at the end, then Cronkite deserves a writing credit?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s